Hey Folks it’s been a while since my last post. The topic of neonatal circumcision performed by hospitals and medical professionals came up on my radar a few months I investigated the arguments of both sides. I came to the following conclusion. Neonatal Circumcisions performed by medical professionals for the most part have been fraudulently performed on the basis of obtaining parental consent. Why do I say this?
I found medical journal articles from 1884 to the present that admit neonatal foreskin has been used in skin-grafts since the late 19th century. In 1937 a conspiracy to traffic neonatal foreskins among hospitals was formed in Brooklyn, New York!!
I found this article for free from the NIH library online!! Since the 1960’s and 1970’s the role of neonatal foreskin in education, research, cell culturing and processing has increased dramatically. Living donors can donate organs and tissues. Tissues include skin, bone and bone marrow. In order for a minor to be a living skin donor the consent of the parents-guardians and the donor must be obtained. The minor donor must be at an age of comprehension in order to consent to the removal of healthy tissue.
I strongly believe that neonatal foreskin is protected under the living donor laws. I believe the medical establishment appropriated the term, “circumcision”, from religious groups like Judaism and Islam in order to commit the ongoing fraud of tissue trafficking while putting the courts under the impression the same parental consent for a sincerely held religious belief applies to their ongoing enterprise of conspiring against defenseless neonatal males.
A law professor has recently written a book on this matter. It’s worth a read! IMO victims of this ongoing fraud have a new way to seek a legal remedy in court without the parents even being involved.
... and unsurprising!
I've just chanced across your articles. This is very interesting: thank you.