Is Involuntary Inoculation with EUA drugs Prima Facie Human Trafficking?
Serious Harm Through Abuse of Law-Legal Process and Coercion
Thanks for being patient folks. During the evaluation of my own civil litigation I came to the conclusion that the so-called “Vaccine Mandates” of 2021 are a prima facie case of Federal Human Trafficking laws that prevent people from being exploited for labor or other services. I believe this theory could be applied to any victim that was involuntarily inoculated because a third party threatened to withhold employment, health care and/or public accommodation.
There is a process for a civil remedy under Federal Statute 18 USC 1595.
IMO, In My Opinion, Since CICP is such an inferior civil remedy for “COVID-19 Vaccine” death or injury anyone or any entity coercing another person to be subjected to CICP for an investigational drug (EUA) is engaging in an act of “involuntary servitude” as the recipient of the involuntary inoculation is not compensated for participating in massive defacto clinical research
All vaccine mandates with EUA products meet the criteria of 18 USC 1589 (a)Whoever knowingly provides or obtains the labor or services of a person by any one of, or by any combination of, the following means—
(3) by means of the abuse or threatened abuse of law or legal process; or
(4) by means of any scheme, plan, or pattern intended to cause the person to believe that, if that person did not perform such labor or services, that person or another person would suffer serious harm or physical restraint,
IMO the August 23, 2021 FDA announcement of approved and licensed “COMIRNATY” that has never been available constitutes an abuse of law and/or legal process under 18 USC 1859 (a)(3).
Many employers and health care providers used the fraudulent “interchangeable” statement by the FDA to justify their so-called mandates.
There’s also a very nice section in the US CODE that provides liability for third parties that benefit from the conspiracy.
(b)
Whoever knowingly benefits, financially or by receiving anything of value, from participation in a venture which has engaged in the providing or obtaining of labor or services by any of the means described in subsection (a), knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that the venture has engaged in the providing or obtaining of labor or services by any of such means, shall be punished as provided in subsection
It’s well documented that publicly traded companies like Moderna or Pfizer can suffer serious price declines in share price if people are not being injected with “COVID-19 Boosters-Vaccines.
It’s also very well documented that Moderna or Pfizer can take a financial loss on unused vials of EUA COVID-19 Vaccines.
It’s also very well documented former Federal Employees have a financial interest in Moderna because of a patent-royalty agreement and litigation.
The manufacturers were well aware of the sham employer mandates and did nothing to prevent “involuntary inoculation” with EUA vials.
The elements of human trafficking violations are there. The big hurdle would be getting a federal law enforcement/prosecution in order to commence civil litigation. Here are some resources to read from the Congressional Research Service and an advocacy center.
In the event you file a report with federal, local or state law enforcement get documentation of the coercive threats, abuse of law-legal process and serious harms. Keeping documents like a CDC Vaccine Card are essential too. Under this theory the inoculator could be liable too as they financially benefitted from the non-consensual involuntary inoculation.
IMO Public Corruption is a key element as corrupt government officials have been involved in this conspiracy.
There’s a generous 10 year statue of limitation to file
“c)No action may be maintained under subsection (a) unless it is commenced not later than the later of—
(1)
10 years after the cause of action arose”
IMO only voluntary vaccinations have CICP protections. Involuntary Inoculation of EUA products seems to be unexplored in civil litigation. I highly encourage you to visit the website, www.covidpenalty.com in order to grasps the concept of informed consent during an EUA, Emergency Use Authorization.
This process may take some time and could lead to rejection letter by attorneys. Given the lack of remedies available I highly encourage people to gather the facts and take the first step of filing a police report to begin the process. If possible always attempt to retain an attorney before moving forward in a Pro Se manner.
Excellent article, thanks, I followed the link from Telegram/How Bad...
What most people aren't aware of is that employers and schools agreed to vax their people and take a bounty per head in exchange, some for many thousands of dollars per head, under condition that they coerced nearly 100% of the population. My understanding was that it was a secret agreement and the deal was quietly brokered through the employer's bank.
This transaction meets the definition of human trafficking by the employer if the employer didn't share the bounty with the employee (some employers did pay employees some amount, though not many did).
Naomi Wolf had several articles about Yale participating in this deal on her website. https://dailyclout.io/?s=Yale
Human Trafficking exists everywhere in maritime law (the law of the sea and the law of contracts)..it is all contracting between corporations posing as governments and the "legal fictions" that these entities have created for everyone based on their Birth Certificate. The movement and steering of people within these maritime systems is just like navigating a ship at sea or in a canal. One example of this is the maritime codes and statutes related to the use of public roadways (canals). We..the People...have (unknowingly) been voluntarily agreeing to be in contract with State DMVs for the "privilege" of "driving" a "vehicle" on a roadway..so we have "drivers" licenses and we register our vehicles with the state and conform to their rules and codes and statutes...when the fact of the matter is that none of us need to do that per the Constitution and case law as living men and women on the "land". As long as we keep contracting with these entities and not getting any redress in their maritime system and associated courts (aka merchant banks)..we remain slaves within a slave system where we have no rights and where the Constitution does not exist. Each man and woman needs to lawfully break these contracts. The Constitution provides each one of us the choice of contracting with whomever we want and we must do it from the private side instead of the public side where we operate as legal corporate fictions in a world that we don't control. These contracts we have with corporate governments ARE human trafficking on paper - we are nothing more that dead entities/cargo on a vessel.