California DFEH accepted claim of reverse medical and reverse genetic information discrimination by aggrieved employee.
#CALGINA #GINA #Discrimination #DFEH #EEOC #reversediscrimination
This is great news for victims of vaccine mandates in California and the United States. An employee that resisted his former employer’s demands to be inoculated with an EUA COVID-19 “Vaccine” has successfully pleaded reverse discrimination under CAL-GINA and reverse medical discrimination for not being a recipient of experimental gene therapy. The DFEH has assigned the petitioner a case number.
A phone interview with the DFEH has been set up. In short the petitioner opted has been following the advice of Dr. Anthony Fauci by taking Vitamin D supplements in order to produce an immune response. This happened in December 2020 when the EUA gene therapy inoculations were available.
Dr. Fauci says this simple drug that's already available might reduce coronavirus risks (bgr.com)
In January 2021 the petitioner began a regimen of oral administration of a preparation, Vitamin D3 + K2, by Vitamin Shoppe. In November 2021 the petitioner went to Quest Diagnostics for a Vitamin D blood test. The result was 39ng/ml. To facilitate gene therapy as a “Vaccine” the CDC changed to definition of a vaccine. The September 2021 definition change opened the door for preparations like VitaminD to fit the definition of a vaccine.
The former joint employers only allowed experimental form of gene therapy inoculations to be accepted as “vaccines” for COVID-19. The petitioner confronted the employer about the “No Gene Therapy No Job” business model. The former employee also submitted a declaration of Self-Vaccination with Off-Label Use of Vitamin D with his test results as an alternative to the experimental gene therapy inoculations. The joint employers rejected the former employee’s Self-Vaccination Protocol.
California’s version of GINA, Genetic Information Non-Discrimination Act, is a much more expanded and generous version of the federal version of GINA, 2008. The federal version of GINA only covers employment and health insurance without punitive damages. The CA version expands coverage to include education, public accommodation, housing and lending with punitive damages. There is so much liability in the State of California.
While plaintiff’s lawyers may not represent clients for this cause of action yet. It’s very important for victims to contact the appropriate state or federal discrimination to determine when the statute of limitations expire to file and preserve their rights. The strategy has a very low entry cost. It may yield maximum results. While attorneys are encouraged they are not required to file “In Pro Per”.